Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

Intel H3C XG310 vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +16%
2.381 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Jul 2022
H3C Graphics
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
35W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
95 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net