Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+379%
2.381 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Nov 2007
H3C Graphics
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
105W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
RV670
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.666 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
