Intel H3C XG310 vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (2000MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (25W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+29%
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Jan 2022
H3C Graphics
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
25W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
