Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GX2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (197W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+520%
2.381 TFLOPS
GeForce 9800 GX2
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Mar 2008
H3C Graphics
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
128
48
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
197W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-450-A2
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.754 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
