Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X2
+261%
8.602 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Unknown
H3C Graphics
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
Unknown
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT C9
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.9 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
