Home GPU Comparison H200 SXM vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

H200 SXM vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

AI GPU We compared a GPU: 141GB VRAM H200 SXM and a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

H200 SXM 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1980MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4800GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
15936 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 700W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H200 SXM +5705%
67 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Hopper
Generation
Quadro Mobile
AI GPU
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1590 MHz
Base Clock
-
1980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

141GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR5
5120bit
Memory Bus
256bit
4800GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

132
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16896
Shading Units
960
528
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
32
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
50 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
1045 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
1979 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
34 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GH200
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Hopper
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
28 nm
80 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
814 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

700W
TDP
100W
1100 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
9.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy