NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
0.049 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q
+12512%
6.18 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 300M
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
682 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
20
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GA107
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
