ATI FirePro V4800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+359%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Apr 2020
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
400
Shading Units
896
20
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
69W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Redwood
GPU Name
TU117
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
