AMD FirePro A320 vs NVIDIA Tegra 3 GPU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 and 0System Shared VRAM Tegra 3 GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 84% (955MHz vs 520MHz)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tegra 3 GPU 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2011
Trinity
Generation
Tegra
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Base Clock
416 MHz
955 MHz
Boost Clock
520 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
22.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
733.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Devastator
GPU Name
Kal-El
A320
GPU Variant
T30-P-A3
TeraScale 3
Architecture
VLIW Vec4
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
0.01 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
ES 2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
-
