AMD FirePro A320 vs Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 and 0 VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 130% (2200MHz vs 955MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro A320
0.733 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
+437%
3.942 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2023
Trinity
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
955 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Dependent
Bandwidth
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
22.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
123.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.885 TFLOPS
733.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.942 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Devastator
GPU Name
Meteor Lake GT1
A320
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Xe-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
