ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
+2876%
2.381 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2020
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
DG1
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
Unknown
59 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
