ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 60W)
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
-
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
130 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
Unknown
92 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
-
Shader Model
6.6
