Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs Intel Arctic Sound M

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2022
Data Center GPU
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
8192
256
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
500W
900 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy