Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+60%
22.22 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Jan 2023
Xe Graphics
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
7168
240
TMUs
448
120
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
204 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
300W
900 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
10 nm
8 billion
Transistors
100 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
