Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 16GB VRAM Jetson Orin NX 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +635%
13.82 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
1.88 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Feb 2023
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
LPDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
1024
240
TMUs
32
120
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
32
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.69 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.38 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.760 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.880 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
940.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA10B
-
GPU Variant
TE980M-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
190 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

500W
TDP
25W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy