Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +730%
11.06 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
512
192
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

350W
TDP
250W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy