Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA GRID K200

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA GRID K200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +383%
11.06 TFLOPS
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jun 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
1536
192
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

350W
TDP
225W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy