Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
6096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +10140%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Apr 2011
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
48
192
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

350W
TDP
32W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy