Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P600 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1620MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
5760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P600 Mobile
1.244 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +789%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1430 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
6144
24
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

25.92 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
38.88 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
19.44 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
38.88 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
8 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy