Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1215MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +137%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
4.666 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
May 2019
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
1920
192
TMUs
120
96
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.76 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
145.8 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.331 TFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.666 TFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
145.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Board Design

350W
TDP
60W
750 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy