Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs AMD FirePro W4100

Intel Arc A350 vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +376%
3.072 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Cape Verde
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy