NVIDIA A2 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (2130MHz vs 1770MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 200.1GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A2
4.531 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+164%
12 TFLOPS
Blender
A2
902
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+193%
2649
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Feb 2024
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
22
1280
Shading Units
2816
40
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
40
Tensor Cores
88
10
RT Cores
22
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
