NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA T600
We compared a Professional market GPU: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM T600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1480MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+77%
3.031 TFLOPS
T600
1.709 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000
+34%
2973
T600
2208
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000
+30%
1350
T600
1038
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
10
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
53.40 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.418 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.709 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
TU117
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
