Tesla C2075 vs Radeon Instinct MI250
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 500W)
Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
12864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
Radeon Instinct MI250
+4302%
45260
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2021
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
208
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
13312
56
TMUs
832
48
ROPs
0
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
