Tesla C2075 vs Quadro FX 770M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 770M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
+1185%
1028
Quadro FX 770M
80
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
783 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
4
448
Shading Units
32
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.000 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
247W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
G96
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
