Quadro K2000 vs Quadro P620
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1354MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.13GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 51W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Quadro P620
+89%
1386
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1354 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.66 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.33 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.66 GFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1386 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.33 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GP107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
