Quadro K2000 vs Quadro P3000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)
Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Quadro P3000 Mobile
+324%
3110
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1088 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
10
384
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
58.32 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.60 GFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.110 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
97.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GP104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N17E-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
