Quadro K2000 vs Tesla T4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 16GB VRAM Tesla T4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 70W)
Tesla T4 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Tesla T4
+1010%
8141
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Sep 2018
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
585 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
40
384
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.8 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
254.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.13 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.141 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
254.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
TU104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
TU104-895-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
