Quadro K2000 vs Quadro P2200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)
Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1493MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Quadro P2200
+421%
3822
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
200.2GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
10
384
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
40
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.72 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
119.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
59.72 GFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.822 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
119.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GP106
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
