Quadro K2000 vs Quadro FX 470
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 0System Shared VRAM Quadro FX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
368 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 51W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
+1528%
733
Quadro FX 470
45
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR5
Memory Type
System Shared
128bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
SM Count
1
384
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.640 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
51W
TDP
38W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
C79
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
-
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
