Quadro 3000M vs Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+3786%
16790
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
DG2-512
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
