Home Comparison Quadro 3000M vs GRID RTX T10 16

Quadro 3000M vs GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
GRID RTX T10 16 +2214%
9999

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
56
240
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
TU102
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net