FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 768GB)
512 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.60GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+33%
1000
GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
749
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2010
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
81.60GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
800
Shading Units
288
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.800 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.20 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
748.8 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
62.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GF114
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
