FireStream 9250 vs CMP 30HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
CMP 30HX
+402%
5027
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2021
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
800
Shading Units
1408
40
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
TU116
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.8