FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (106W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+121%
1000
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
451
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jul 2012
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
800
Shading Units
144
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
106W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GF116
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1