3D Rage IIC PCI vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 25 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
18176 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Dec 2022
Rage 2
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
48GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
142
-
Shading Units
18176
1
TMUs
568
1
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
AD102
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
AD102
Rage 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
-
Shader Model
6.8
