3D Rage IIC PCI vs NVS 510
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Oct 2012
Rage 2
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
2GB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
Shading Units
192
1
TMUs
16
1
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GK107
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Rage 2
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
-
Shader Model
5.1
