3D Rage IIC PCI vs FireMV 2250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (256GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jan 2007
Rage 2
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
256MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
1
TMUs
4
1
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
RV516
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
R500
UMC
Foundry
UMC
500 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
2.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
Shader Model
3.0
