3D Rage IIC PCI vs GeForce GT 220
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 220 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jan 2010
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
1024MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
6
-
Shading Units
48
1
TMUs
24
1
ROPs
8
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
58W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
G94
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
-
Shader Model
4.0
