3D Rage IIC PCI vs T1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
T1000 's Advantages
Released 24 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
May 2021
Rage 2
Generation
Quadro Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
4GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
896
1
TMUs
56
1
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
TU117
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
-
Shader Model
6.8
