3D Rage IIC PCI vs MTT S50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 8GB VRAM MTT S50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
MTT S50 's Advantages
Released 26 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Oct 2023
Rage 2
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
8GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
-
SM Count
-
Shading Units
2048
1
TMUs
128
1
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
153.6 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
153.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.830 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.915 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Rage 2
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
Unknown
39 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
-
Shader Model
6.5
