Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +9%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro K4100M
1.627 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
1152
48
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.94 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.78 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.627 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.78 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GK104
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
N15E-Q3-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy