Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1252MHz vs 1163MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +178%
1.786 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P400
9
Quadro M2000 +200%
27
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1228 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1252 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.06GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
256
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
20.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
10.02 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
641.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
20.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GM206
GP107-825-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy