Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M1000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M1000M
1.017 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +75%
1.786 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M1000M +15%
124
Quadro M2000
107
OctaneBench
Quadro M1000M
26
Quadro M2000 +3%
27
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

15.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
31.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1017 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
31.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM206
N16P-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy