Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs Intel Arc A310

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1750MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
Arc A310 +133%
2.688 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K1200
131
Arc A310 +200%
393
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro
Generation
Alchemist
Professional
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
DG2-128
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy