Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 87% (2100MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
18944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X +6999%
81.72 TFLOPS
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2015
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
512
1216
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.97 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1151 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.97 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-860-A2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
153 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

750W
TDP
45W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy