Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +58%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Sep 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
70
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
4480
256
TMUs
280
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
GA100
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy