Quadro 400 vs Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 400 Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 2400W)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
16336 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
108
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+48446%
52430
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
16384
16
TMUs
1024
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
2400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
100 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
