Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison FireMV 2400 PCI vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

FireMV 2400 PCI vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FireMV 2400 PCI Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
40
-
Shading Units
5120
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV380
GPU Name
AD104
Rage 9
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
-
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net