NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
2616 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm
+2329%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
2688
Shading Units
72
224
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.488 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.46 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
162.0 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
235W
TDP
45W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM4
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
